Ethereum Wallet gets stuck on sync

4 stars based on 32 reviews

I have tried to import just the XFC but that doesn't work either. I'm not able to download the whole GB Bitcoin blockchain client and am not very technical either. What could be the next easiest thing I could try? Try on another day again. Or use the website coinb. I did not bitcoin wallet out of sync stuck at 99 this myself but others were successful.

Ok I tried yesterday, but I will try bitcoin wallet out of sync stuck at 99. Yes I saw your steps for a raw transaction, not sure I'd be able to follow that but I will give it a try if I have too. Thanks for your help. Is XCP still under active development? Seems like just importing tokens is a longstanding issue. Yes CP is under active development. Feel free to checkout bitcoin wallet out of sync stuck at 99. Aah thanks, I see there is a lot going on actually and with good updates.

Wonder why the sweep issue is such a lingering problem then. In Omni for example you can import private key and send tokens fairly easy, I would have thought XCP attached tokens to BTC addresses in a similar way.

Insufficient BTC at address 1xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Need approximately 0. To spend unconfirmed coins, use the flag. Hi same here, i want to "sweep" SJCX and i have 0. I don't know what to do You can check how much xcp are hidden at the wrong address using https: You can use the txid later to check if your transaction got confirmed e. I tried it myself today but only got some small btc and not the altcoins I wanted to sweep. What is wrong in these steps? I am having a recurring issue.

I cannot seem to sweep my XCP tokens from my online bitcoin wallet. I enter all the right details and have enough btc for transaction fees but nothing happens. This has happened several times before, the last time I managed to do it by using Counterwallet in beta but cannot find it online.

Does anyone know how I can access it? Guess you misunderstand the naming of the tool Sweep-XCP-Paperwallet does not mean it only works for paperwallet but it works for bitcoin wallet out of sync stuck at 99 wallet too.

I already used it and it is the easiest way and always works. Sweep Private Keys- Issue Support. Has anyone used this before is it safe? I can see "Preparing output for transactions chaining". I use chrome and firefox, I can see what wrong with it: To spend unconfirmed coins, use the flag --unconfirmed.

Maybe send some more BTC to the address and try sweep again. Do you get the same error "Need approximately 0. You could use a raw transaction which you sign and send using coinb. BUT 7 Enter amount minimum 0. Let's try another way. First create a raw transaction using curl, see: Then continue on coinb. Hello all, I am having a recurring issue. Also, can this issue be fixed! Hi and thanks for your post. Is there no other means of sweeping private keys on to another web wallet.

It seems really impractical to do what you suggest….

Crcbtccrycashbitcoin yobit exchange charts 1 month

  • Bitcoin 60 mh sales

    Freebitco bot autopilot bitcoin wikipedia

  • Get free bitcoin game

    Potential uses for blockchain explorer

Trader bot bitcoin10 ghs bitcoin miner watts

  • Bitcoin how long to mine a bitcoin

    Bitcoin price chart 2011 chevrolet

  • Born of the gods kraken tokens

    James gosling liquid robotics revenue

  • Bitcoin mining is it worth it 2017

    Free btc forexhow to buy bitcoin with credit card reddit

Compatibilidad de signos entre cancer y capricornio

48 comments Dogecoin value chart usd vs golden

Don tapscott bitcoin stock

Replication in computing involves sharing information so as to ensure consistency between redundant resources, such as software or hardware components, to improve reliability, fault-tolerance , or accessibility.

A computational task is typically replicated in space , i. Replication in space or in time is often linked to scheduling algorithms [1].

The access to a replicated entity is typically uniform with access to a single, non-replicated entity. The replication itself should be transparent to an external user. Also, in a failure scenario, a failover of replicas is hidden as much as possible. The latter refers to data replication with respect to Quality of Service QoS aspects. Computer scientists talk about active and passive replication in systems that replicate data or services:.

If at any time one master replica is designated to process all the requests, then we are talking about the primary-backup scheme master-slave scheme predominant in high-availability clusters. On the other side, if any replica processes a request and then distributes a new state, then this is a multi-primary scheme called multi-master in the database field. In the multi-primary scheme, some form of distributed concurrency control must be used, such as distributed lock manager.

Load balancing differs from task replication, since it distributes a load of different not the same computations across machines, and allows a single computation to be dropped in case of failure.

Load balancing, however, sometimes uses data replication especially multi-master replication internally, to distribute its data among machines. Backup differs from replication in that it saves a copy of data unchanged for a long period of time. Replication is one of the oldest and most important topics in the overall area of distributed systems.

Whether one replicates data or computation, the objective is to have some group of processes that handle incoming events. If we replicate data, these processes are passive and operate only to maintain the stored data, reply to read requests, and apply updates. When we replicate computation, the usual goal is to provide fault-tolerance. For example, a replicated service might be used to control a telephone switch, with the objective of ensuring that even if the primary controller fails, the backup can take over its functions.

But the underlying needs are the same in both cases: A number of widely cited models exist for data replication, each having its own properties and performance:. The master logs the updates, which then ripple through to the slaves. The slave outputs a message stating that it has received the update successfully, thus allowing the sending and potentially re-sending until successfully applied of subsequent updates.

Multi-master replication , where updates can be submitted to any database node, and then ripple through to other servers, is often desired, but introduces substantially increased costs and complexity which may make it impractical in some situations. The most common challenge that exists in multi-master replication is transactional conflict prevention or resolution.

Most synchronous or eager replication solutions do conflict prevention, while asynchronous solutions have to do conflict resolution.

For instance, if a record is changed on two nodes simultaneously, an eager replication system would detect the conflict before confirming the commit and abort one of the transactions.

A lazy replication system would allow both transactions to commit and run a conflict resolution during resynchronization. Database replication becomes difficult when it scales up. Usually, the scale up goes with two dimensions, horizontal and vertical: Problems raised by horizontal scale-up can be alleviated by a multi-layer multi-view access protocol.

Vertical scale-up causes fewer problems in that internet reliability and performance are improving. When data is replicated between database servers, so that the information remains consistent throughout the database system and users cannot tell or even know which server in the DBMS they are using, the system is said to exhibit replication transparency.

Active real-time storage replication is usually implemented by distributing updates of a block device to several physical hard disks. This way, any file system supported by the operating system can be replicated without modification, as the file system code works on a level above the block device driver layer. It is implemented either in hardware in a disk array controller or in software in a device driver.

The most basic method is disk mirroring , typical for locally connected disks. The storage industry narrows the definitions, so mirroring is a local short-distance operation. A replication is extendable across a computer network , so the disks can be located in physically distant locations, and the master-slave database replication model is usually applied. The purpose of replication is to prevent damage from failures or disasters that may occur in one location, or in case such events do occur, improve the ability to recover.

For replication, latency is the key factor because it determines either how far apart the sites can be or the type of replication that can be employed. To address the limits imposed by latency, techniques of WAN optimization can be applied to the link. Many distributed filesystems use replication to ensure fault tolerance and avoid a single point of failure. See the lists of distributed fault-tolerant file systems and distributed parallel fault-tolerant file systems.

File-based replication is replicating files at a logical level rather than replicating at the storage block level. There are many different ways of performing this. Unlike with storage-level replication, the solutions almost exclusively rely on software. With the use of a kernel driver specifically a filter driver , that intercepts calls to the filesystem functions, any activity is captured immediately as it occurs.

This utilises the same type of technology that real time active virus checkers employ. At this level, logical file operations are captured like file open, write, delete, etc.

The kernel driver transmits these commands to another process, generally over a network to a different machine, which will mimic the operations of the source machine.

Like block-level storage replication, the file-level replication allows both synchronous and asynchronous modes. In synchronous mode, write operations on the source machine are held and not allowed to occur until the destination machine has acknowledged the successful replication. Synchronous mode is less common with file replication products although a few solutions exist.

File level replication solution yield a few benefits. Firstly because data is captured at a file level it can make an informed decision on whether to replicate based on the location of the file and the type of file. Hence unlike block-level storage replication where a whole volume needs to be replicated, file replication products have the ability to exclude temporary files or parts of a filesystem that hold no business value.

This can substantially reduce the amount of data sent from the source machine as well as decrease the storage burden on the destination machine. A further benefit to decreasing bandwidth is the data transmitted can be more granular than with block-level replication. If an application writes bytes, only the bytes are transmitted not a complete disk block which is generally bytes. On a negative side, as this is a software only solution, it requires implementation and maintenance on the operating system level, and uses some of machine's processing power CPU.

Similarly to database transaction logs , many file systems have the ability to journal their activity. The journal can be sent to another machine, either periodically or in real time by streaming. On the replica side, the journal can be used to play back file system modifications. One of the notable implementations is Microsoft 's System Center Data Protection Manager DPM , which performs periodical updates but does not offer real-time replication.

This is the process of comparing the source and destination filesystems and ensuring that the destination matches the source. The key benefit is that such solutions are generally free or inexpensive. The downside is that the process of synchronizing them is quite system-intensive, and consequently this process generally runs infrequently.

Another example of using replication appears in distributed shared memory systems, where it may happen that many nodes of the system share the same page of the memory - which usually means, that each node has a separate copy replica of this page.

For example, the primary might perform some computation, streaming a log of updates to a backup standby process, which can then take over if the primary fails. This approach is the most common one for replicating databases, despite the risk that if a portion of the log is lost during a failure, the backup might not be in a state identical to the one the primary was in, and transactions could then be lost.

We're gaining fault-tolerance but spending twice as much money to get this property. For this reason, starting in the period around , the distributed systems research community began to explore alternative methods of replicating data. An outgrowth of this work was the emergence of schemes in which a group of replicas could cooperate, with each process backup up the others, and each handling some share of the workload.

Jim Gray , a towering figure [7] within the database community, analyzed multi-primary replication schemes under the transactional model and ultimately published a widely cited paper skeptical of the approach " The Dangers of Replication and a Solution ".

In a nutshell, he argued that unless data splits in some natural way so that the database can be treated as n disjoint sub-databases, concurrency control conflicts will result in seriously degraded performance and the group of replicas will probably slow down as a function of n. His solution, which is to partition the data, is only viable in situations where data actually has a natural partitioning key.

The situation is not always so bleak. For example, in the —87 period, the virtual synchrony model was proposed and emerged as a widely adopted standard it was used in the Isis Toolkit, Horus, Transis, Ensemble, Totem, Spread , C-Ensemble, Phoenix and Quicksilver systems, and is the basis for the CORBA fault-tolerant computing standard; the model is also used in IBM Websphere to replicate business logic and in Microsoft's Windows Server enterprise clustering technology. Virtual synchrony permits a multi-primary approach in which a group of processes cooperate to parallelize some aspects of request processing.

The scheme can only be used for some forms of in-memory data, but when feasible, provides linear speedups in the size of the group. A number of modern products support similar schemes. For example, the Spread Toolkit supports this same virtual synchrony model and can be used to implement a multi-primary replication scheme; it would also be possible to use C-Ensemble or Quicksilver in this manner. WANdisco permits active replication where every node on a network is an exact copy or replica and hence every node on the network is active at one time; this scheme is optimized for use in a wide area network.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article includes a list of references , but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations.

Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. October Learn how and when to remove this template message. Fault-tolerant computer system Change data capture Cloud computing Cluster computing Cluster manager Log Shipping Mirror website Optimistic replication Process group Software transactional memory Transparency Virtual synchrony. Archived from the original on Retrieved 21 October Retrieved 30 January Retrieved from " https: Computing Data synchronization Fault-tolerant computer systems.

Articles lacking in-text citations from October All articles lacking in-text citations All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from September Articles with unsourced statements from September Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers.

Views Read Edit View history. This page was last edited on 15 May , at By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.