5 stars based on
Before we get to the benchmarks, I want to spend a bit of time talking about the impact of CPU architectures at a middle degree of technical depth. At a high level, there are a number of peripheral issues when it comes to comparing these two SoCs, such as the quality of their fixed-function blocks. This subject alone is probably worthy of an article, but the short version for those that aren't really familiar with this topic is that an ISA defines how a processor should behave in response to certain instructions, and how these instructions should be encoded.
For example, if you were to add two integers together in the EAX and EDX registers, x dictates that this would be equivalent to 01d0 in hexadecimal. One key difference is that ARM dictates that every instruction is a fixed number of bits. In the case of ARMv8-A and ARMv7-A, all instructions are bits long unless you're in thumb mode, which means that all instructions are bit long, but the same sort of trade-offs that come from a fixed length instruction encoding still apply.
Thumb-2 is a variable length ISA, so in some sense the same trade-offs apply. At this point, it might be evident that on the implementation side of things, a decoder for x86 instructions is going to be more complex. On the other hand, a CPU implementing the x86 ISA would have to determine how many bytes to pull in at a time for an instruction based upon the preceding bytes. A57 Front-End Decode, Note the lack of uop cache.
Although the decoder of an ARM CPU already knows how many bytes it needs to pull in at a time, this inherently means that unless all 2 or 4 bytes of the instruction are used, each instruction contains wasted bits.
The major issue here is that due to RC delay in the metal wire interconnects of a chip, increasing the size of an instruction cache inherently increases the number of cycles that it takes for an instruction to get from the L1 cache to the instruction decoder on difference between 32 bit and 64 bit software macbook processor ppt CPU.
Of course, there are other issues worth considering. For example, in the case of x86, the instructions themselves can be incredibly complex. One of the simplest cases of this is just some cases of the add instruction, where you can have either a source or destination be in memory, although both source and destination cannot be in memory.
Of course, pipelining and other tricks can make the throughput of such instructions much higher but that's another topic that can't be properly addressed within the scope of this article. Looking at our example of an add instruction, ARM would require a load instruction before the add instruction.
This has two notable implications. The first is that this once again is an advantage for an x86 CPU in terms of instruction density because fewer bits are needed to express a single instruction.
The final issue here is that x86 just has an enormous number of instructions that difference between 32 bit and 64 bit software macbook processor ppt to be supported due to backwards compatibility. As a result, all x86 CPUs made today still have to start in real mode and support the original bit registers and instructions, in addition to bit and bit registers and instructions. Of course, to run a program in mode is a non-trivial task, but even in the x ISA it isn't unusual to see instructions that are identical to the x equivalent.
By comparison, ARMv8 is designed such that you can only execute ARMv7 or AArch32 code across exception boundaries, so practically programs are only going to run one type of code or the other.
However, today ISA is basically irrelevant to the discussion due to a number of factors. The second is that decoding of these instructions has been difference between 32 bit and 64 bit software macbook processor ppt optimized around only a few instructions that are commonly used by compilers, which makes the x86 ISA practically less complex than what the standard might suggest.
Introduction and Design SoC Analysis: On x86 vs ARMv8 Before we get to the benchmarks, I want to spend a bit of time talking about the impact of CPU architectures at a middle degree of technical depth. Post Your Comment Please log in or sign up to comment. Performance is good, but without supporting professional software, the hardware is useless. Log in Don't have an account?
Sign up now Username Password Remember Me.